现代出版与文化品位--《文化关怀中的现代出版》读后     

黄弗同 《广播电视大学学报》2006,(2):123-124

出版界的许多问题需要从文化的角度加以解决。《文化关怀中的现代出版》以文化为全书的脉络,探讨出版的诸多方面,思理有据,多有创获,特别是对出版物文化品位的强调,既有现实意义,又有学术价值。  相似文献   

近年来关于马克思主义中国化基本经验研究综述     

康月磊 《涪陵师范学院学报》2008,24(2)

近年来,马克思主义中国化基本经验的研究取得了丰硕的成果。在科学对待马克思主义、立足国情、发展创新、尊重实践、正确对待中国传统文化和坚持党的理论建设等六个方面,基本体现了近十多年来马克思主义中国化基本经验研究的现状。  相似文献   

跨世纪文论话语的两难处境与重建吁求——解读《冲突与重建》的三个视点     

赵崇璧  龚举善 《郧阳师范高等专科学校学报》2007,27(1):39-44

中国现代文论的重建步履经过近一个世纪的积淀已日显成熟和厚重,但依然存在许多困难.其间,不乏东方与西方、传统与现代、全球化与本土化等等的冲突与两难抉择.而且,后现代主义带来的多元共生思潮和读图时代的迅猛君临,几乎颠覆了既有的话语方式与学科体系,我们确实面临着新的挑战.如何超越困境、重建文论话语体系,进而建立拥有当代发言权和世界影响力的具有中国特色的文艺理论学派?张荣翼新著《冲突与重建》从文论视野、本体辨认与建设立场等方面进行了跨世纪反思与重构.这或许正是我们应该努力的方向.  相似文献   

Health literacy and consumer health information     

Maria J. Grant PhD 《Health information and libraries journal》2023,40(1):1-2

The rigours of the past few years have demonstrated the importance of good health literacy levels with the imperative of being able to obtain and interpret information to maintain and improve one's health never more apparent. With this in mind, this issue is focused on consumer health information, the gender and population group differences that exist in information seeking behaviour, the challenges of understanding medical explanations and terminology, and existing criteria to assess and ultimately produce better consumer health information.  相似文献   

Evaluation and publication delay in Ibero-American scientific journals     

Jon Zabala  Borja González-Albo  Ana García-García  Aurora Garrido-Domínguez  José Ignacio Vidal-Liy  Luis R. Álvarez-Díez  Soledad Hernando-Tundidor  Yara Mostazo-Fernández  Teresa Abejón 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):205-216

This article analyses the review, acceptance and publication dates of a sample of 21,890 articles from 326 Ibero-American scientific journals from all subject areas and countries included in the Latindex Catalogue 2.0 and published between 2018 and 2020 (freely available as an open access dataset). The aim is to discover evaluation and publication times. The evaluation process takes a median of 110 days, the publication process, a median of 82 days, and the whole process, a median of 224 days. Statistical differences are found according to periodicity, subject areas, countries, existence of a printed version and article type (Call for Papers or General articles). From the data we find that the delay in publication is longer than publishers themselves report to the DOAJ. STEM areas present the most similarity in publication patterns, having a higher number of evaluation days (Ed) than publication days (Pd); Arts and Humanities present the opposite pattern, with a higher Pd than Ed. In the case of Social Sciences, the times are similar. General articles and Call for Papers articles differ in terms of Ed, but not Pd, indicating that Call for Papers revisions are faster.  相似文献   

Investigation of potential gender bias in the peer review system at Reproduction     

Marie Biolková  Tom Moore  Karen Schindler  Karl Swann  Andy Vail  Lindsay Flook  Helen Dick  Greg Fitzharris  Christopher A. Price  Norah Spears 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(1):25-30

  相似文献   

傅兰雅研究综述     

高肖 《德州学院学报》2011,27(5):107-110

作为传教士的傅兰雅,有着与其他传教士与众不同的在华经历,在对近代中国的西学传播和科学普及方面影响深远,近年来,这一领域越来越引起学术界的重视。  相似文献   

A Systematic Review of Financial Literacy as a Termed Concept: More Questions Than Answers     

Ashley E. Faulkner 《Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship》2015,20(1-2):7-26

Financial literacy, as a concept by that name, has only been explored in library science literature for a little over a decade. The concept, and especially the role of libraries in furthering this literacy, is still evolving. This systematic literature review examines the current definition of financial literacy, why financial literacy matters, where the public has been accessing financial literacy education to date, the difficulties encountered, by libraries and others, in providing this education, and how these challenges might be addressed moving forward.  相似文献   

论科技学术期刊的4个特定审稿评判标准   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

毛殷 《编辑学报》2015,27(5):419-422

编辑作为审稿中的主导者,其审稿决策质量对于保障审稿的公平、公正、客观起到十分重要的作用.制订明确、统一的审稿标准是有效规范编辑的审稿决策行为、提高审稿可靠性的基础.在审稿决策机制中,容易产生偏差的审稿标准主要包括研究领域的适合度、研究类型的适合度、创新性和主题的关注度(读者的阅读需求).围绕期刊特点对这些评价标准及其要素做出越详细的规定,就越能减少主观性给审稿决策带来的负面影响.  相似文献   

Word 2007既有功能的新应用:参考文献编辑校对     

程红 《编辑学报》2015,27(5):459-460

介绍在Word 2007环境中利用窗口拆分、搜索、排序和宏编程功能核对文中参考文献一致性、规范文后参考文献表著录用符号和检出重复文献的方法,以提高编辑编修稿件中参考文献的工作效率.  相似文献